Google only forbids case study solution buying and selling of links that manipulate their search effects. They cannot forbid or adjust or manage or otherwise legally affect case study answer buying and promoting of links a practice which predates case study answer search engines existence by a number of years. Anyone who assists a shopper in acquiring links has case study solution legal right to charge case study answer client for case study solution work done. Google and other search engines ask that case study answer link placements and structures be editorially determined by case study answer sites offering case study answer links, not by case study solution sites seeking case study answer links or their intermediaries. Some compromises, corresponding to when an SEO submits a site to a well reputable listing like Yahoo!or DMOZ that has clear and actual submission checklist, are appropriate. As for redirecting secondary domain names to a first domain, its a way of blockading parasitical SEO thoughts that might capitalize on mis spellings of general domain names.